 |
 |
Message from Dr Raymond Wu (deceased),
Ex-Chairperson of the Community Investment and Inclusion Fund Committee |
| |
New Concepts, New Strategies to achieve New Results
for a Changing World |
| |
There is a
clear consensus emerging in the international community
that sustainability must be ensured in the quest for economic
development. It means that economic growth must take due
account of the need to protect the natural ecology and prevent
the depletion of natural resources. However there is less
attention on the probable impact of economic growth on the
social environment – such as the distortion of social
values, the alienation of human relationships, and the erosion
of social capital. After almost half a century of technological
advancement, especially with the extensive infiltration
of the silicone chips, productivity has been hugely increased,
resulting in surplus production as technology has easily
displaced those human activities that only require lower
level intellectual and physical capabilities. Along with
globalization, dominance of the market economy and liberalization
of trade, a culture of the economic jungle (where each for
their own) results. The values of commodities and the flow
of wealth are at the mercy of our pervasive information
technology and marketing strategies. This has unfairly undermined
the ability of the working class to negotiate, hence planting
the seeds of future class conflicts when the rich easily
gets richer and the poor, poorer.
It is a matter of survival. As the world
economy radically transforms, every country in the world,
capitalistic or socialistic alike, is pursuing similar financial
strategies to encourage consumerism in order to maintain
a certain level of economic growth, tax income and employment
opportunities for the populace. This provided fertile grounds
for the business sector to blind us with materialism, consumerism
and glorify the cultures of vanity and indulgence. Many
of our traditional festivals that celebrate faith and relationships
such as Christmas, Easter, Valentine, Halloween, and Mothers
Day have degenerated into just another occasion to consume.
Let’s refocus on Hong Kong, this
beloved and compact home of ours, which has also been challenged
by the global economy, and whose production base has significantly
altered along with changes in the market. The production
work force is having difficulties in keeping up with these
macro changes that are further complicated by our own special
political and social situations. An imbalance in the highly
and lowly paid jobs results, aggravating the polarization
between the rich and poor, and increasing the burden on
the government-funded safety net. For the relatively materially
well-off societies such as Hong Kong, the promotion of consumption
is one legitimate way to redistribute wealth. But this can
lead to erosion of our core values. Whilst traditional Chinese
values have cherished simplicity, frugality, integrity and
scholarship as the means to life enrichment, the glorification
of materialism and consumerism has redefined success, taste
and status as those who consume. What were once healthy
values became distorted. The impact extends beyond igniting
the material desires amongst the poor, leading to psychological
imbalances that adversely affect the next generations. Some
politicians and even social workers were convinced that
relative material deprivation were the cause of loss of
self-respect and confidence amongst young people, and some
even promulgate the expectation that the legitimate function
of government was to satisfy every material desires.
We are really lagging the world in such
mindsets. If we take a moment to reflect, the rest of the
world, especially those in post-modern and developed economies,
many have come to the realization that money and material
wealth cannot really enhance the quality of life. The renaissance
of religions reflects this renewed search for spiritual
fulfilment. The “market” is now wide open for
more spiritual products and services, which the more enterprising
are starting to develop. Just as the emergence of environmentally
friendly products has been helpful towards protecting the
natural ecology, the development of spiritual products should
also aid the healthy development of our social milieu; and
could facilitate the development of social capital.
|
| |
In response, the CIIF has endorsed the following principles
-
People are equal - our values and
dignity are intrinsic to our human life and spirit.
No one should be valued differently on the bases of
their intelligence, appearance, wealth or health. We
should not be ranked (as inferior or superior) because
of our individual differences. We all have the right
to live and the responsibility to develop. In the spirit
that "we are all part of a big family", all civilized
communities must take seriously their responsibility
to provide a safety net that would safeguard these intrinsic
rights and developmental opportunities for all. This,
however, should not be the sole responsibility of government,
but one to be shared by the families and wider community.
-
There is talent in each of us that
could be put to good use - our talents are multi-faceted
and not confined to academic achievements or intellectual
abilities alone. The aim of education must be focused
on bringing out the potentials in all; and effective
education often takes place outside of the classroom.
The CIIF puts emphasis on identifying, developing and
exercising the contributive potentials of each and all.
- Blessed are those who give rather than receive - is a wisdom that has been well articulated by many wiser people before.
- As Bajin put it - the meaning of our life lies in our ability to give; and not in receiving, or in beseeching;
-
Alan Cohen also believed that
our true joy results from giving with love and compassion
without counting costs and returns. Conflicts and
tensions between people, districts and countries
are almost inevitable as our societies are driven
by market economy ideology. As we move towards greater
polarization of wealth and poverty, those who have
must share a bit more with those who have not. Governments
have a definite role in wealth distribution. But
a more harmonious, inclusive and peaceful society
could only be built if all of us were willing to
take up a bigger "third" sector role and the business
sector assuming greater corporate social responsibilities.
-
The intangibles and invisible are
the most enduring and valuable - whilst material relief
would serve, at most, to temporarily alleviate emergency
needs. Hong Kong is essentially a relatively rich society,
where material deprivation is generally uncommon, with
a reasonably sound safety net in place. Hence, knowledge
and expertise, experience and wisdom; social networks
as well as opportunities are most needed by those caught
in the cycles of poverty. As Carnegie has pointed out,
attitudes and personality rather than intelligence,
are the critical success factors in shaping our careers
and future. Therefore the emphasis of empowerment is
not on skill training, but on shaping personality, and
activating motivation, enhancing positivity, curiosity,
perseverance, search for excellence, and integrity.
-
Material gains and sensory stimulations
bring only transient gratification. A higher and more
enduring level of satisfaction would be founded on relationships
within the family, between partners and amongst friends.
Another level of fulfillment is when we found meaning
in our lives, sense of achievement, contribution, being
loved and respected.
|
| |
To promote these CIIF values and beliefs, the CIIF has set the following strategies:
-
Interactive learning through project
implementation - the social capital concepts being promoted
by the CIIF are abstract that promulgation by lecturing
through the written or electronic media would neither
be appropriate nor effective. Real impact could only
be achieved through doing - so that we could progress
from knowing, understanding, realization, integration,
articulation and coaching to action. Through the projects
put forth by various community or service organizations,
they start to mobilize and reshape social connections,
vulnerable groups are engaged through the development
of volunteer teams; mutual help networks with mutual
trust are being built with compassion, care and support;
and social participation were achieved through capacity
building, and pathways built through bridging and linking
social capital.
-
We are careful in our assessment
of projects to ensure their alignment with the CIIF
objectives, to exercise proper stewardship of public
funds, to encourage innovation for new solutions rather
than simply to supplement or expand existing services.
We hope to mobilize the participation of the entire
community to address their own concerns, not because
this approach is more effective in providing prompt
solutions and preventing future problems. It is because
this approach is more conducive to strengthening the
formation of social networks, building of communities
and enhancement of social harmony. We treasure every
proposal. We do not let go of any group that shows commitment
to the fund objectives and demonstrates willingness
to work with the CIIF to develop strategies. We encourage
continuous innovation, enhancement, a search for excellence
and adaptability in response to changing circumstances.
-
We put a lot of emphasis on strategies
to achieve "complementary" and interlocking matching
that applies to relationships between people, organizations,
sectors and social strata. The search for this complementarity
sharpens our understanding of the strengths and weaknesses
of oneself and those of others. The strongest are those
interlocking relationships that involve both giving
and accepting. The exchanges are most enduring when
they involve non-material resources such as knowledge,
expertise, experience, wisdom and social networks. We
value the acts of compassion when one is most in need.
We emphasize relationships that are lasting with the
ability to respond at times of need.
-
We search for the most despondent
and helpless within our community and re-ignite their
hope with compassion; to rebuild their confidence by
finding their potentials; and to re-energize their life
journey, providing the channels for them to serve others.
The crux is in returning to our first principle, in
that we recognize and respect the intrinsic values of
each person. We take time to understand their individual
needs. We walk closely with them to rebuild mutual trust;
and not to waver in our support until the person is
firmly re-established.
-
We expect each project to continuously
develop and learn from different sources in search of
excellence without becoming complacent with any initial
achievement. We must seek to continuously surpass one's
own standard, not those of others. We do not need to
give ourselves a "pass" mark, and we should definitely
not assign ourselves a full mark.
-
We look for practical results that
are sustainable, cumulative in impact, and "snowballing"
in effect. We are not impressed by simple statistics,
or one-off surge of energy that do not last. We firmly
believe in the power of relationships and ideas that
influence change.
|
| |
Since the Fund was first launched over
3 years ago, we have approved over 90 projects, 70 of which
have commenced implementation, involving over 150 paid staff,
mobilizing over 15,000 volunteers, and involving over 900
collaborators. Together, they have been working hard to
achieve various “little good deeds” without
acclaim - building relationships, weaving networks, resolving
problems, building capacities, motivating those most marginalised
to re-engage with mainstream society, uplifting those who
falter, and finding opportunities for those without jobs
or hope. As they give selflessly they will gain much happiness
and wisdom along the way.
These are unmistakable social capital results.
These little results are gathering like the precious underground
spring water. They do not have the glory or impact of an
ocean. But when cumulated to a certain level, they will
be the life springs that nourish us all.
|
|